9.2 KiB
Competitive Analysis & Roadmap - Summary
Date: 2025-01-24 Prepared for: Puaros Guardian Documents Created:
- ROADMAP_NEW.md - Updated roadmap with reprioritized features
- COMPARISON.md - Comprehensive competitor comparison
- docs/v0.6.0-CONFIGURATION-SPEC.md - Configuration feature specification
🎯 Executive Summary
Guardian has 5 unique features that no competitor offers, positioning it as the only tool built for AI-assisted DDD/Clean Architecture development. However, to achieve enterprise adoption, we need to first match competitors' baseline features (configuration, visualization, CI/CD, metrics).
Current Position (v0.5.1)
Strengths:
- ✅ Hardcode detection with AI suggestions (UNIQUE)
- ✅ Framework leak detection (UNIQUE)
- ✅ Entity exposure detection (UNIQUE)
- ✅ Repository pattern validation (UNIQUE)
- ✅ DDD-specific naming conventions (UNIQUE)
Gaps:
- ❌ No configuration file support
- ❌ No visualization/graphs
- ❌ No ready-to-use CI/CD templates
- ❌ No metrics/quality score
- ❌ No auto-fix capabilities
📊 Competitive Landscape
Main Competitors
| Tool | Strength | Weakness | Market Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| SonarQube | Multi-language + Security | Complex setup, expensive | Enterprise leader |
| dependency-cruiser | Best visualization | No hardcode/DDD | Dependency specialist |
| ArchUnit | Java architecture | Java-only | Java ecosystem |
| FTA | Fast metrics (Rust) | No architecture checks | Metrics tool |
| ESLint | Huge ecosystem | No architecture | Code quality standard |
Guardian's Unique Position
"The AI-First Architecture Guardian for TypeScript teams practicing DDD/Clean Architecture"
Market Gap Filled:
- No tool optimizes for AI-assisted coding workflow
- No tool deeply understands DDD patterns (except ArchUnit for Java)
- No tool combines hardcode detection + architecture enforcement
🚀 Strategic Roadmap
Phase 1: Market Parity (v0.6-v0.10) - Q1-Q2 2026
Goal: Match competitors' baseline features
| Version | Feature | Why Critical | Competitor |
|---|---|---|---|
| v0.6.0 | Configuration & Presets | All competitors have this | ESLint, SonarQube |
| v0.7.0 | Visualization | dependency-cruiser's main advantage | dependency-cruiser |
| v0.8.0 | CI/CD Integration Kit | Enterprise requirement | SonarQube |
| v0.9.0 | Auto-Fix (UNIQUE!) | Game-changer, no one has this | None |
| v0.10.0 | Metrics & Quality Score | Enterprise adoption | SonarQube |
After v0.10.0: Guardian competes with SonarQube/dependency-cruiser on features
Phase 2: DDD Specialization (v0.11-v0.32) - Q3-Q4 2026
Goal: Deepen DDD/Clean Architecture expertise
30+ DDD pattern detectors:
- Aggregate boundaries
- Anemic domain model
- Domain events
- Value Object immutability
- CQRS validation
- Saga pattern
- Anti-Corruption Layer
- Ubiquitous Language
- And 22+ more...
After Phase 2: Guardian = THE tool for DDD/Clean Architecture
Phase 3: Enterprise Ecosystem (v1.0+) - Q4 2026+
Goal: Full enterprise platform
- VS Code extension
- JetBrains plugin
- Web dashboard
- Team analytics
- Multi-language support (Python, C#, Java)
🔥 Critical Changes to Current Roadmap
Old Roadmap Issues
❌ v0.6.0 was "Aggregate Boundaries" → Too early for DDD-specific features ❌ v0.12.0 was "Configuration" → Way too late! Critical feature postponed ❌ Missing: Visualization, CI/CD, Auto-fix, Metrics ❌ Too many consecutive DDD features → Need market parity first
New Roadmap Priorities
✅ v0.6.0 = Configuration (MOVED UP) → Critical for adoption ✅ v0.7.0 = Visualization (NEW) → Compete with dependency-cruiser ✅ v0.8.0 = CI/CD Kit (NEW) → Enterprise requirement ✅ v0.9.0 = Auto-Fix (NEW, UNIQUE!) → Game-changing differentiator ✅ v0.10.0 = Metrics (NEW) → Compete with SonarQube ✅ v0.11+ = DDD Features → After market parity
💡 Key Recommendations
Immediate Actions (Next 2 Weeks)
-
Review & Approve New Roadmap
- Read ROADMAP_NEW.md
- Approve priority changes
- Create GitHub milestones
-
Start v0.6.0 Configuration
- Read v0.6.0-CONFIGURATION-SPEC.md
- Create implementation tasks
- Start Phase 1 development
-
Update Documentation
- Update main README.md with comparison table
- Add "Guardian vs Competitors" section
- Link to COMPARISON.md
Next 3 Months (Q1 2026)
-
Complete v0.6.0 (Configuration)
- 8-week timeline
- Beta test with community
- Stable release
-
Start v0.7.0 (Visualization)
- Design graph system
- Choose visualization library
- Prototype SVG/Mermaid output
-
Marketing & Positioning
- Create comparison blog post
- Submit to Product Hunt
- Share on Reddit/HackerNews
Next 6 Months (Q1-Q2 2026)
-
Complete Market Parity (v0.6-v0.10)
- Configuration ✅
- Visualization ✅
- CI/CD Integration ✅
- Auto-Fix ✅ (UNIQUE!)
- Metrics ✅
-
Community Growth
- 1000+ GitHub stars
- 100+ weekly npm installs
- 10+ enterprise adopters
📈 Success Metrics
v0.10.0 (Market Parity Achieved) - June 2026
Feature Parity:
- ✅ Configuration support (compete with ESLint)
- ✅ Visualization (compete with dependency-cruiser)
- ✅ CI/CD integration (compete with SonarQube)
- ✅ Auto-fix (UNIQUE! Game-changer)
- ✅ Metrics dashboard (compete with SonarQube)
Adoption Metrics:
- 1,000+ GitHub stars
- 100+ weekly npm installs
- 50+ projects with guardian.config.js
- 10+ enterprise teams
v1.0.0 (Enterprise Ready) - December 2026
Feature Completeness:
- ✅ All baseline features
- ✅ 30+ DDD pattern detectors
- ✅ IDE extensions (VS Code, JetBrains)
- ✅ Web dashboard
- ✅ Team analytics
Market Position:
- #1 tool for TypeScript DDD/Clean Architecture
- Top 3 in static analysis for TypeScript
- Known in enterprise as "the AI code reviewer"
🎯 Positioning Strategy
Target Segments
- Primary: TypeScript developers using AI coding assistants (GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude, ChatGPT, Cline)
- Secondary: Teams implementing DDD/Clean Architecture
- Tertiary: Startups/scale-ups needing fast quality enforcement
Messaging
Tagline: "The AI-First Architecture Guardian"
Key Messages:
- "Catches the #1 AI mistake: hardcoded values everywhere"
- "Enforces Clean Architecture that AI often ignores"
- "Closes the AI feedback loop for cleaner code"
- "The only tool with auto-fix for architecture" (v0.9+)
Differentiation
Guardian ≠ SonarQube: We're specialized for TypeScript DDD, not multi-language security Guardian ≠ dependency-cruiser: We detect patterns, not just dependencies Guardian ≠ ESLint: We enforce architecture, not syntax
Guardian = ESLint for architecture + AI code reviewer
📚 Document Guide
ROADMAP_NEW.md
Purpose: Complete technical roadmap with reprioritized features Audience: Development team, contributors Key Sections:
- Current state analysis
- Phase 1: Market Parity (v0.6-v0.10)
- Phase 2: DDD Specialization (v0.11-v0.32)
- Phase 3: Enterprise Ecosystem (v1.0+)
COMPARISON.md
Purpose: Marketing-focused comparison with all competitors Audience: Users, potential adopters, marketing Key Sections:
- Feature comparison matrix
- Detailed tool comparisons
- When to use each tool
- Use case recommendations
- Winner by category
v0.6.0-CONFIGURATION-SPEC.md
Purpose: Technical specification for Configuration feature Audience: Development team Key Sections:
- Configuration file format
- Preset system design
- Rule configuration
- Implementation plan (8 weeks)
- Testing strategy
🎬 Next Steps
Week 1-2: Planning & Kickoff
- Review all three documents
- Approve new roadmap priorities
- Create GitHub milestones for v0.6.0-v0.10.0
- Create implementation issues for v0.6.0
- Update main README.md with comparison table
Week 3-10: v0.6.0 Development
- Phase 1: Core Configuration (Week 3-4)
- Phase 2: Rule Configuration (Week 4-5)
- Phase 3: Preset System (Week 5-6)
- Phase 4: Ignore Patterns (Week 6-7)
- Phase 5: CLI Integration (Week 7-8)
- Phase 6: Documentation (Week 8-9)
- Phase 7: Beta & Release (Week 9-10)
Post-v0.6.0
- Start v0.7.0 (Visualization) planning
- Marketing push (blog, Product Hunt, etc.)
- Community feedback gathering
❓ Questions?
For technical questions:
- Email: fozilbek.samiyev@gmail.com
- GitHub Issues: https://github.com/samiyev/puaros/issues
For strategic decisions:
- Review sessions: Schedule with team
- Roadmap adjustments: Create GitHub discussion
📝 Changelog
2025-01-24: Initial competitive analysis and roadmap revision
- Created comprehensive competitor comparison
- Reprioritized roadmap (Configuration moved to v0.6.0)
- Added market parity phase (v0.6-v0.10)
- Designed v0.6.0 Configuration specification
Status: ✅ Analysis complete, ready for implementation
Confidence Level: HIGH - Analysis based on thorough competitor research and market positioning